![compare os x to linux similarities compare os x to linux similarities](https://techdifferences.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/linux-vs-windows.jpg)
As for application familiarity, that’s another debate all together. Have Ubuntu and Mint caught up to OS X? With respect to unification of look and feel, it’s becoming a very close race. Linux Mint also has grown, leaps and bounds, with unifying the look and feel of the desktop. Unity does an incredible job of working the look and feel of the design to every aspect of the desktop. Users, especially the average user, wants polish, they want something that looks as modern as the mobile tools they use.ĭistributions, such as Ubuntu, have gone to great lengths to take that idea of consistency and elegantly apply it throughout. I would add modern to that – Improved modern desktop polish – because users are no longer happy with the likes of flat desktops, such as Gnome 2, Fluxbox, or KDE. That statement alone should ring very true with Linux desktop designers across the globe. Matthew Garret, in his essay The Desktop and the Developer proposes that “A combination of improved desktop polish and spending effort on optimising developer workflows would stand a real chance of luring these developers away from OS X with the promise that they’d spend less time fighting web browsers, leaving them more time to get on with development.” Without something similar – Linux loses out. Whether you like the app or not, few apps do a better job of syncing multi-media and other data as does iTunes. Since the smartphone has become such an incredibly integral component of day-to-day life, users rely upon the tools to keep those devices in sync with their data. Beyond that, you have to start looking at apps…even more specifically, the likes of iTunes. No design element has been overlooked and every window opened retains the overall look and feel better than any other desktop. That company is rumored to be Apple (a Black Lab Linux developer announced (in a goodbye letter) he was leaving the team to join Apple “…in a Linux endeavor they recently acquired.” It’s fairly easy to put that two and two together.) But still, until there are facts, it is conspiracy, at best.īut what is it about OS X that not only draws the users, but has Linux developers scrambling to clone? One fact that cannot be denied about OS X is the consistency found throughout. One in particular (PearOS) succeeded so well it was bought by an unknown American company and removed from existence. Some of those clones have succeeded, to varying levels. There have been many attempts at “cloning” the OS X desktop on Linux. It not only has deep roots in Linux architecture, it has been accepted by numerous types of users.
![compare os x to linux similarities compare os x to linux similarities](https://cdn.educba.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Linux-vs-MAC-vs-Windows-1.png)
First and foremost, there is no debating that OS X is a fast-growing platform. That last idea is a bit of a conundrum – one with multiple arguments.
![compare os x to linux similarities compare os x to linux similarities](https://sourcegear.com/images/screenshots/diffmerge/img_merge_linux.png)
Which desktop is the best? Should Linux hold onto what has always worked? Should the Linux desktop mimic what others already know? Dare Linux look and feel like OS X? The sheer variety available to the Linux desktop brings with it a level of discussion and debate most other platforms do not know.